The old adage "Be careful what you ask for, you may get it" comes to mind as I listen to the ululations of the GOP over the line-item veto. Most GOP lawmakers favored giving the president the power of the pen.But now, since the president has wielded the pen, things are different. Take Sen.Robert Bennett, R-Utah.He campaigned for passage of the line-item veto, but now he's saying that maybe it was a bad idea.He is reported to have said he is "prepared to reconsider" his position. Why? Well, a $12.7 million Army Reserve project in his district was one of the projects that got the ax. Sen.Ted Stevens, R-Ala., termed Clinton's veto an "arrogant use of power" and says he may back a line-item repeal. At least Stevens didn't lose any appropriations from his district.Makes him sound a little more sincere. In the House, the wailing and gnashing of teeth wasn't quite as pronounced, but it was still heard.
GARY GERARD, Times-Union Managing Editor- | July 28, 2016