Editor, Times-Union:
Democrats have a long history of supporting lawlessness and they have the nerve to say no one is above the law. At times they act like spoiled children that expect to get their way all the time even if they have been naughty.
Take for instance sanctuary cities and states and schools that discriminate against various people. A judge in San Francisco said Trump can't stop funding sanctuary cities. Do you think that if a teen driver wrecks the family car he deserves to have a new car and not be punished by his parents? That would be ridiculous. To give taxpayer money to cities that harbor criminals and do insane acts is also ridiculous. Those who say the judge is right must have never known kids that deserved to be punished.
Harvard believes it deserves to have billions in taxpayers money even though it discriminates against Jews, supports the fascists that support Hamas and hate Israel, and silences those they disagree with just like they did in Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. Harvard has had a long tradition of opposing laws that they didn't agree with because it wanted to continue discrimination which opposes the Constitution.
Democrats call Trump a dictator for obeying the law and expecting others to obey the law. Those laws are Constitutional and Democrats oppose the Constitution when it gets in their way. Trump uses the federal law to deport illegal aliens and judges oppose his actions as if they are tin pot dictators. They are like judges were in the South during the Jim Crow laws days. If a Black person were considered guilty of a crime even though a crime wasn't committed, at times they were lynched and got away with it. If today's judges that oppose deportation which is federally mandated are right, then lynching would have to be considered right. Both types of judges were evil yet Democrats have supported their evil acts.
Many Democrats must hate females because they consider trans females females so they can humiliate female athletes. A generation ago they made comedy movies about men pretending to be female athletes so they could be on female teams. Now it's considered acceptable. When Trump says schools that allow boys to compete as girls if they claim they are girls shouldn't receive government money because the schools support unfairness, Democrats attack him.
Abortion could be considered racist at times since so many abortion clinics are in Black communities so less Black babies can be born. Margaret Sanger didn't like so many Blacks giving birth. Yet Democrats are proud to support this form of racism. Democrats think they will win big in 2026 despite their lawlessness. Do they deserve to be unleashed to possibly destroy America?
Rick Badman
Warsaw, via email