Local Orthopedic Firms React To Health Care Bill

July 28, 2016 at 4:25 p.m.

By Daniel [email protected]

On Sunday night, one of the final steps in health care reform took place as a bill passed through the House of Representatives.

Once Senate democrats get a majority vote, which may be as early as today barring any procedural delays, the bill will become law and it will provide insurance to around 30 million Americans.

But the $940 billion bill will cause a new tax for medical device manufacturers.[[In-content Ad]]That includes the "Big Three" local orthopedic manufacturers.

Though a change to the bill Saturday lowered the tax on companies like Biomet, DePuy and Zimmer, a 2.3 percent tax will now apply to all Class I, II and III devices.

The 2.9 percent tax rate would have only included Class II and III devices.

The tax would hit those companies' books starting Jan. 1, 2013.

The result of the tax would result in roughly $20 billion in taxes on the medical device industry by 2019.

That is a change from earlier drafts of the bill that would have put a $40 billion tax on the industry starting this year.

Despite the decrease, the tax remains an issue for local orthopedic companies.

"I think at the end of the day, the excise tax reduces the ability of medical device companies to spend money on discretionary spending," said Bill Kolter, vice president of government affairs, public affairs and corporate communciations with Biomet. "That could have an effect on things like (research and development) and employment."

Kolter said Biomet will take a look at all of its discretionary spending if and when the tax comes into effect in 2013.

"The orthopedic industry is a great example of an industry of innovation and leaderships," said Kolter. "It provides economic benefits for the health care system."

In a statement released this morning, Brad Bishop, director of public affairs with Zimmer, gave his company's reaction.

"We applaud expanded insurance coverage for millions of Americans. Now that the House has passed the Senate reform bill and a separate, companion bill that modifies the Senate bill, we will monitor progress in the Senate and engage with our Congressional contacts as appropriate.

"While we continue to disagree with a tax on medical technology innovations, we are pleased that the House refrained from increasing the $20 billion device industry tax. We are also pleased that the House ultimately agreed to reduce the governing tax rate from 2.9 percent to 2.3 percent and to change the Senate fee structure to a deductible excise tax that will be delayed two years to 2013."

Bishop also laid out Zimmer's interests in terms of health care.

"Broadly speaking, our main interests with respect to any health care reform bill continue to be:

"n To protect patient access to the most effective technologies and treatments;

"n To preserve the financial incentives that will continue to spur medical innovation that leads to better treatments and care for patients;

"n To make sure medical care will continue to be determined by health care professionals in consultation with patients; and

"n To ensure that reimbursement for procedures will appropriately reflect the clinical and economic benefits of medical technology including our implantable devices."

On Sunday night, one of the final steps in health care reform took place as a bill passed through the House of Representatives.

Once Senate democrats get a majority vote, which may be as early as today barring any procedural delays, the bill will become law and it will provide insurance to around 30 million Americans.

But the $940 billion bill will cause a new tax for medical device manufacturers.[[In-content Ad]]That includes the "Big Three" local orthopedic manufacturers.

Though a change to the bill Saturday lowered the tax on companies like Biomet, DePuy and Zimmer, a 2.3 percent tax will now apply to all Class I, II and III devices.

The 2.9 percent tax rate would have only included Class II and III devices.

The tax would hit those companies' books starting Jan. 1, 2013.

The result of the tax would result in roughly $20 billion in taxes on the medical device industry by 2019.

That is a change from earlier drafts of the bill that would have put a $40 billion tax on the industry starting this year.

Despite the decrease, the tax remains an issue for local orthopedic companies.

"I think at the end of the day, the excise tax reduces the ability of medical device companies to spend money on discretionary spending," said Bill Kolter, vice president of government affairs, public affairs and corporate communciations with Biomet. "That could have an effect on things like (research and development) and employment."

Kolter said Biomet will take a look at all of its discretionary spending if and when the tax comes into effect in 2013.

"The orthopedic industry is a great example of an industry of innovation and leaderships," said Kolter. "It provides economic benefits for the health care system."

In a statement released this morning, Brad Bishop, director of public affairs with Zimmer, gave his company's reaction.

"We applaud expanded insurance coverage for millions of Americans. Now that the House has passed the Senate reform bill and a separate, companion bill that modifies the Senate bill, we will monitor progress in the Senate and engage with our Congressional contacts as appropriate.

"While we continue to disagree with a tax on medical technology innovations, we are pleased that the House refrained from increasing the $20 billion device industry tax. We are also pleased that the House ultimately agreed to reduce the governing tax rate from 2.9 percent to 2.3 percent and to change the Senate fee structure to a deductible excise tax that will be delayed two years to 2013."

Bishop also laid out Zimmer's interests in terms of health care.

"Broadly speaking, our main interests with respect to any health care reform bill continue to be:

"n To protect patient access to the most effective technologies and treatments;

"n To preserve the financial incentives that will continue to spur medical innovation that leads to better treatments and care for patients;

"n To make sure medical care will continue to be determined by health care professionals in consultation with patients; and

"n To ensure that reimbursement for procedures will appropriately reflect the clinical and economic benefits of medical technology including our implantable devices."

Have a news tip? Email [email protected] or Call/Text 360-922-3092

e-Edition


e-edition

Sign up


for our email newsletters

Weekly Top Stories

Sign up to get our top stories delivered to your inbox every Sunday

Daily Updates & Breaking News Alerts

Sign up to get our daily updates and breaking news alerts delivered to your inbox daily

Latest Stories


Divide And Conquer
Editor, Times-Union: It is glaringly obvious to anyone with functioning brain cells that today’s MAGA (formerly known as the Grand Old Party) has only one strategy to win the 2024 election: divide and conquer and pull the wool over the voting public’s eyes. Their playbook consists of misinformation, distortion of facts, projections, conspiracy theories and plain old bald-faced lies. If they cannot find damning evidence of lawlessness or evil deeds in their opponents’ resumes, they just make something up: Kamala’s intelligence or race, Tim’s real pet dog or his mysterious connection to China; Biden’s unwillingness to help America’s catastrophe victims.

Check Before You Vote
Editor, Times-Union: Do we want the next four years to be like the last years?

High Stakes
Editor, Times-Union: Our future is on the ballot from the presidential race at the top of the governor’s race and all the key races down ballot. Control of Congress, our ability to vote, our democratic processes, long-held freedoms, are all on the ballot. “A lot of the things that get decided at the federal level really are so distanced from the everyday of peoples’ lives ... But the state-level elections are the ones that really have a huge, huge impact ...” (AARP Bulletin, July-August 2024)

Winona Zoning
Editor, Times-Union: This is an abbreviated version of a recent effort to sell a house in Winona Lake. It may be helpful should you find yourself in such straits as my husband and I found ourselves.

Apology To Family Express
Editor, Times-Union: To the establishment and staff of Family Express: