Kubacki On Marriage

July 28, 2016 at 4:25 p.m.

By -

Editor, Times-Union:
The Indiana Family Institute and the American Family Association of Indiana focus on educating the public on issues of faith, family and freedom. The Indiana Family Institute is the Indiana affiliate of Focus on the Family, Family Research Council and Alliance Defending Freedom. The American Family Association of Indiana is the Indiana affiliate of the American Family Association.
We don’t get involved in elections. However, as the lead lobbyists on the Marriage Amendment in the Indiana General Assembly over much of the last 10 years, we must respond to factually inaccurate information coming out of House District 22.  In attempting to argue that her votes for the Marriage Amendment in 2011, then against the Marriage Amendment in 2014, were consistent, State Representative Rebecca Kubacki has, on multiple occasions, made historically false claims.
On 2/28/14 at a public meeting and in public statements since then she has argued that when she voted for the Marriage Amendment in 2011 it only contained the first sentence, “Only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in Indiana,” and that the second sentence of this two-sentence amendment, “A legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized” was added in the Senate.  She goes on to claim that she unknowingly voted for both sentences when the Marriage Amendment came out of conference committee.
The problem is that the Marriage Amendment was introduced in 2011 with both sentences, passed the House by a vote of 70-26 on 2/15/11 (with Rep. Kubacki as one of the 70 votes in favor), passed the Senate by a vote of 40-10 on 3/29/11 and not even a comma was ever changed throughout that process. The Marriage Amendment never went to conference committee as the House and Senate both overwhelmingly passed the exact same language, with both sentences intact, word for word. In fact, on 2/10/11 State Representative Terri Austin offered an amendment to remove the second sentence of the Marriage Amendment. It was defeated and Representative Kubacki voted in favor of keeping the second sentence in the Marriage Amendment.
Neither IFI nor AFA of Indiana wishes to tell citizens in House District 22 how to vote. What we do want is to make sure citizens understand what really happened in the Indiana General Assembly.
Ryan McCann
Indiana Family Institute
Micah Clark
American Family Association of Indiana
Indianapolis, via email[[In-content Ad]]

Editor, Times-Union:
The Indiana Family Institute and the American Family Association of Indiana focus on educating the public on issues of faith, family and freedom. The Indiana Family Institute is the Indiana affiliate of Focus on the Family, Family Research Council and Alliance Defending Freedom. The American Family Association of Indiana is the Indiana affiliate of the American Family Association.
We don’t get involved in elections. However, as the lead lobbyists on the Marriage Amendment in the Indiana General Assembly over much of the last 10 years, we must respond to factually inaccurate information coming out of House District 22.  In attempting to argue that her votes for the Marriage Amendment in 2011, then against the Marriage Amendment in 2014, were consistent, State Representative Rebecca Kubacki has, on multiple occasions, made historically false claims.
On 2/28/14 at a public meeting and in public statements since then she has argued that when she voted for the Marriage Amendment in 2011 it only contained the first sentence, “Only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in Indiana,” and that the second sentence of this two-sentence amendment, “A legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized” was added in the Senate.  She goes on to claim that she unknowingly voted for both sentences when the Marriage Amendment came out of conference committee.
The problem is that the Marriage Amendment was introduced in 2011 with both sentences, passed the House by a vote of 70-26 on 2/15/11 (with Rep. Kubacki as one of the 70 votes in favor), passed the Senate by a vote of 40-10 on 3/29/11 and not even a comma was ever changed throughout that process. The Marriage Amendment never went to conference committee as the House and Senate both overwhelmingly passed the exact same language, with both sentences intact, word for word. In fact, on 2/10/11 State Representative Terri Austin offered an amendment to remove the second sentence of the Marriage Amendment. It was defeated and Representative Kubacki voted in favor of keeping the second sentence in the Marriage Amendment.
Neither IFI nor AFA of Indiana wishes to tell citizens in House District 22 how to vote. What we do want is to make sure citizens understand what really happened in the Indiana General Assembly.
Ryan McCann
Indiana Family Institute
Micah Clark
American Family Association of Indiana
Indianapolis, via email[[In-content Ad]]
Have a news tip? Email [email protected] or Call/Text 360-922-3092

e-Edition


e-edition

Sign up


for our email newsletters

Weekly Top Stories

Sign up to get our top stories delivered to your inbox every Sunday

Daily Updates & Breaking News Alerts

Sign up to get our daily updates and breaking news alerts delivered to your inbox daily

Latest Stories


Chip Shots: Wrong Side Of The Bed Sunday
I was a member of Toastmasters International, a speaking and communication club affording several opportunities to improve the aforementioned skills along with improving brevity.

Warsaw Board of Zoning
Bowen Center - Group Home

Warsaw Board of Zoning
Bowen Center - Offices

Notice Of Guardianship
GU-48 Christian

Indiana Lien
Mechanics Lien