E-Edition
News
News
Coronavirus Coverage
Local
National
CDC Microsite
Public Occurences
Courts
Education
Leisure
Business
Agriculture
News Briefs
Corrections and Clarifications
Sports
Manchester University
Local Sports
Grace College
Lakeland Christian Academy
Manchester H.S.
Tippecanoe Valley
Triton
Warsaw
Wawasee
Whitko
Local Roundup
Obituaries
Opinion
News Views
Letters To The Editor
Kudos
Guest Columns
Lifestyles
Anniversaries
Weddings
Engagements
Births
Religion
Club News
Generations
Classifieds
Classified Display Ads
Public Notices
Legal Display
Public Notices
Forms
Anniversary
Birth
Birthday
Engagement
Wedding
Subscribe
Contact Us
About Us
Facebook
Twitter
Between the Lines: State's Smoking Ban Pretty Much AâJoke
Dan Riordan
, Times-Union Staff Writer
Friday, June 8, 2012 8:30 AM
I guess this is the column where Iâstart off with some witty smoking pun.
I’ll attempt to avoid those, but I can say for me, the state’s new smoking law isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on.
The new law eliminates smoking from many businesses but exempts bars, taverns and any restaurant that doesn’t allow people under 21.
Even as someone who has smoked cigarettes in his life, I have to concede that my desire to smoke in a public place doesn’t supercede the desire of other people not to smell or inhale it.
I think this new law is just yet another example of government grandstanding then not going far enough.
Remember that this smoking ban was supposed to be a crown jewel for GovernorâMitch Daniels in his final full year of being the state’s chief executive?
It was supposed to be done by the time the Super Bowl came around.
Anytime someone from out of state visits, especially from the coasts, one of the first things I always hear is how amazed they are that Indiana allows people to smoke in public.
And not amazed like, “Wow, this is so great,”âbut more like, “Wow, how backwards is this place?”
Like so many other things, this creates an imbalance. Some places that offer essentially the same services can allow smoking while others can’t.
And spare me the argument of letting the free market decide.
If my favorite sandwich joint allows smoking and the place down the street doesn’t, I’m going to pick the one I like and deal with the smoke.
The free market argument isn’t an apples-to-apples argument.
I understand exempting cigarette shops and cigar bars.
But exempting casinos and bars just shows how much influence lobbyists have over how we are governed.
Have you seen the mind-boggling amount of oxygen tanks in a casino? That alone should keep cigarettes out of casinos.
This law was designed to benefit public health.
It is now folly for cynics like me.
Everyone loves to pile on the federal government for their terrible lack of leadership.
And it’s well deserved.
But as good as Governor Mitch Daniels has been, this is definitely a black eye for his administration.
Daniels has always been out front on health issues in the state. His initiatives have been pretty good.
Talking to him when he was in town for the Chamber dinner this year, he wanted a smoking ban without a bunch of exemptions.
What he got was an ashtray full of week-old cigarettes (I couldn’t help myself).
This is yet just another example in a long line of instances where what’s perceived to be good for the public loses out to the interests of a few.
Follow staff writer Daniel Riordan on Twitter at @TUNews_Riordan
He can be reached at 574-267-3111, Ext. 246.
X
Site Design and Content Copyright 2016 1up! Software ©
2021
1up! Software
, All rights reserved.
3rd Party Content
Back to Mobile Site
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##